ASL VM Runtime Active
TEE Attestation Ready
FIPS 203/204/205 · SLH-DSA
ARC42 v1.0 · DORA Art. 5–14 · ECMA-424 · RFC 6962
[ ARCHITECTURE: ARC42 v1.0 · CONFORMANCE: DORA Art. 5–14 · SEC PQFIF · NCSC Phase 1–3 ]
The First Machine-Verified Cryptographic Compliance Engine

Cryptographic Compliance,
Proven.

One Binary. One Command. One Signed Report.
◆

VeriCrypt ingests your certificate inventory and outputs a cryptographically signed, Merkle-proofed .pqc compliance artifact that any regulator can independently verify — offline, in under one second. No cloud. No telemetry. No external dependencies. Just mathematical proof that your cryptographic posture satisfies DORA, PQFIF, and NCSC requirements.

< 60s
10K Cert Scan
< 1s
Report Verification
O(1)
Evidence Check
SLH-DSA
FIPS 205 Signed
0
Network Egress
↓ Download VeriCrypt ◈ User Manual ⊞ Implementation Manual
Market Positioning
The Only Tool That Proves Compliance, Not Just Reports It

Existing PQC tools scan and report. VeriCrypt is the only system that combines formal verification, regulatory mapping, cryptographic evidence structures, and air-gapped delivery into a single binary. Competitors require cloud upload. VeriCrypt runs where your certificates live — on air-gapped infrastructure.

IBM Quantum-Safe Explorer
Cloud-based scanner. Requires data upload. No formal compliance proofs. No air-gap capability. No regulatory mapping.
Arqit Enterprise Inhibitor
SaaS symmetric key agreement. No CBOM output. No certificate inventory scanning. No DORA article mapping.
CertiK / Lambda256
Smart contract formal verification. Adjacent domain — verifies code correctness, not organizational cryptographic posture.
Manual Consultancy Audits
Expensive, slow, unreproducible. No cryptographic evidence. No machine-verifiable proofs. No continuous monitoring capability.
6 Verified Architectural Firsts
Six Breakthroughs in a Single Binary
01

Multiplicative HNDL Exposure Model

Structurally-justified scoring from Rufino et al. (2026). Additive models are provably inadequate for capturing vulnerability-exposure interactions.

MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN
02

ASL Virtual Machine Compliance

Regulatory axioms compile to deterministic bytecode. Bit-identical replay for regulators. Compile-time constraint enforcement.

SEEDVM VERIFIED
03

Constant-Size Evidence Structure

Kao (2026) formalized. The .pqc signature binds to timestamp, binary hash, CBOM Merkle root, and TEE attestation. O(1) verification regardless of scan size.

KAO Q-AUDIT INTEGRITY
04

Shapley Value Risk Attribution

Game-theoretic decomposition identifies exactly which assets contribute most to systemic quantum exposure. Phase 1/2/3 migration roadmap.

COALITION-STRUCTURED
05

Air-Gapped SLH-DSA Signing

NIST FIPS 205 post-quantum signatures generated entirely offline. Per-customer keys. No embedded secrets in the distributed binary.

FIPS 205 · OFFLINE
06

TEE Hardware Root of Trust

Intel TDX and AMD SEV-SNP attestation proves the binary ran untampered. Epoch-cached for O(1) overhead per scan operation.

CONFIDENTIAL COMPUTING
Regulatory Conformance
Certified ·
DORA Art. 5–14 · Crypto-Agility SEC PQFIF · Multi-Jurisdictional UK NCSC Phase 1–3 · Migration NIST FIPS 203/204/205 · Post-Quantum ECMA-424 · CBOM 1.7 RFC 6962 · Signed Tree Heads NIST SP 1800-38 · PQC Migration EU NIS Cooperation Group · 2026/2030/2035 PQCMM v1.0 · PKI Consortium SLSA Level 3 · Build Provenance ISO/IEC 25010 · Quality Model DORA Art. 5–14 · Crypto-Agility SEC PQFIF · Multi-Jurisdictional UK NCSC Phase 1–3 · Migration NIST FIPS 203/204/205 · Post-Quantum ECMA-424 · CBOM 1.7 RFC 6962 · Signed Tree Heads NIST SP 1800-38 · PQC Migration EU NIS Cooperation Group · 2026/2030/2035 PQCMM v1.0 · PKI Consortium SLSA Level 3 · Build Provenance ISO/IEC 25010 · Quality Model
Platform Invariant · ASL VM Verified at Scan Time
"Every quantum-vulnerable cryptographic asset is identified, classified, and mapped to a NIST PQC replacement. The multiplicative HNDL exposure score is structurally justified — additive models cannot capture the interaction between vulnerability and operational exposure."
ASL VM Verified
Deterministic Replay
Merkle Proof Per Finding
SLH-DSA Signed
01 / Platform Capabilities
7 Pipeline Stages. Zero Cloud Dependency.
All capabilities as-built
Traceable to ARC42 §3 Building Block View
STAGE-01 · Ingestion
◉
Multi-Source Asset Discovery
Recursive certificate parsing (PEM, DER, PKCS#12), CSV/JSON CMDB imports, TLS endpoint probing, code repository scanning. Streaming parsers bound memory regardless of input size.
x509-parser · rustls-pemfile · tokio-rustls
STAGE-02 · Graph
⛓
Heterogeneous Dependency Graph
Typed nodes and edges capture trust chains, encryption relationships, configuration dependencies, and containment. Topologically sorted with circular dependency detection.
petgraph · Coalition-Structured Shapley
STAGE-03 · Exposure
⊡
Multiplicative HNDL Analysis
Per-asset temporal hazard via Ld > Ha condition. Multiplicative factorization of vulnerability × exposure / defense-attack ratio. Shapley value decomposition.
Rufino et al. (May 2026) · CTI-Shapley (2025)
STAGE-04 · Compliance
◈
ASL Virtual Machine Runtime
Regulatory axioms compiled to deterministic bytecode at build time. Executed against inventory at scan time. Produces schedule trace for bit-identical regulator replay.
seedc · seedvm · DORA · PQFIF · NCSC · NIST
STAGE-05 · Prioritization
⇌
Phase 1/2/3 Migration Roadmap
Shapley-ranked remediation priorities. CMAP and PQCMM dual maturity scoring. EU 2026/2030/2035 milestone alignment. Migration complexity estimation per asset.
CMAP · PQCMM v1.0 · DORA Art. 12.3
STAGE-06 · CBOM
⬡
CycloneDX 1.7 CBOM Output
ECMA-424 compliant cryptographic bill of materials. cryptoProperties with NIST quantum security levels. PQC algorithm naming from CycloneDX Cryptography Registry.
ECMA-424 · IETF draft-xipher-cbom-extension
STAGE-07 · Report
🔏
Signed .pqc Compliance Artifact
Self-contained JSON report with Merkle root, SLH-DSA signature, ASL VM execution trace, TEE attestation quote, and PKI certificate chain. Constant-time verification.
NIST FIPS 205 · Kao (2026) · RFC 6962
FEAT-08 · Verification
✓
Offline Regulator Verifier
Freely-distributable vericrypt-verify binary. Validates signature, Merkle root, TEE attestation, and ASL VM replay — all offline. O(1) verification regardless of scan size.
Proof-Carrying Output · Zero Trust
FEAT-09 · TEE
🛡
Hardware Root of Trust
Intel TDX and AMD SEV-SNP attestation. Epoch-cached for O(1) overhead. Attestation quote embedded in .pqc report header with certificate chain to CPU vendor root.
SCRT Labs (May 2026) · Agentic Witnessing
Performance Benchmarks
<60s
10,000 Certificate Scan
End-to-end pipeline on 8-core Linux
<1s
.pqc Report Verification
Constant-time O(1) evidence check
<512MB
Memory for 100K Certificates
Streaming parsers, bounded allocation
0
Network Egress During Scan
Air-gapped by design · DORA Art. 5–14
Capability Comparison

Based on public product documentation, research papers, and technical analysis — May/June 2026.

Capability VeriCrypt IBM QSE Arqit EI CertiK Manual Audit
Formal Compliance Proofs ✓ — — Code Only —
Air-Gapped Operation ✓ — — — ✓
CBOM 1.7 Output ✓ Partial — — —
Multiplicative HNDL Model ✓ — — — —
SLH-DSA Signed Reports ✓ — — — —
TEE Attestation ✓ — — — —
DORA Article Mapping ✓ — — — Manual
Offline Regulator Verification ✓ — — — —
"Trust nothing. Verify everything. The .pqc report is a self-contained evidence artifact — regulators need no access to your systems, no trust in Verity, and no network connection."
VeriCrypt ARC42 v1.0 · Architectural Blueprint
Ready to Deploy
Air-Gapped Compliance
Starts Here.

The first scan is free. To generate signed .pqc reports — the artifact your regulator will actually accept — you need a licence key. Contact channel sales to get yours.

◆ Contact Channel Sales
📱 WhatsApp 📞 +1 (868) 719-5236